My guides say that Elena became Marilyn's mother and that another sister named Maria (Grand Duchess Maria Pavlovna) became Zsuzsanna. This means that Sherrie was a daughter of Marilyn's in Russia and this contradicts Kevin Ryerson who channels Ahtun-Re who insists that Sherrie is the only linear reincarnation of Marilyn Monroe. No-one can insist on such things.
Kevin/ Ahtun-Re might have made a very common and understandable error concerning the complicated connections of a tight soul group down the timeline of history.
The detailed information I have provided came from a higher source and there are hundreds of other readings posted here for you all to consider.
I have thousands of other readings, which my guides do not permit me to share now. Perhaps in a book, 20 years from now they will appear in print.
I do not insist they are all correct. I will say that many of the readings have been checked by more than one person skilled in past life nformation and the viewing of the Akashic Records. Whether they are believable, convincing or helpful is entirely a personal matter for the reader. What I do say is my readings have come into existence and have been presented to humanity for a reason at this time.
Just information to consider. Another (interesting?) possibility.
Information that has been thrown across our paths for some reason. Perhaps a test for all of us?
When we arrive at fixed conclusions about our reality, there is the danger that powers from a higher dimension will come along and suggest we have more work to do. This is why we have UFOs and crop circles to contend with.
We could try burying our heads in the sand and tell the UFOs to go away. We could pretend that all crop circles were made by 2 people called Doug & Dave, but do we grow? My guides insist that is why we are all here.
Growth.
Last edited by brianstalin : Today at 06:01 AM.
#174 Today, 06:09 AM
pastlifetherapy
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 20
Hi everyone,
The editors of my book: "Marilyn Monroe Returns: The Healing of a Soul," from Hampton Roads Publishing, warned and convinced me not to publish Kevin Ryerson's/Ahtun-Re's long chapter in the book, including besides MM's rebirth in the person of Sherrie, other of her reincarnations, but just to make a very short mention of them. That is because my very hard scientifically based work, as a reputable and recognized scientist, was not to be tainted with "psychic," which in public's eyes, and especially those of skeptics, holds a very low degree of credibility, precisely due to its track record of errors and disagreement between psychics. The
editors felt that would further compromise the credibility of the book, by undermining my own credibility as a scientist and university professor, which is usually held in the public eye, in high esteem.
Therefore, my professional work with Sherrie is primarily founded on my scientifically based tools, over a span of eight years of very hard labour, which I very briefly mentioned in my previous posts. That is why, reading the book would do justice to this understanding and further discussion on this topic. And this is why, the prestigious Library Journal recommended my book to university libraries, due to its intriguing scientific foundation.
In conclusion, I submit that I have enough data to demonstrate that Sherrie Lea Laird IS the reincarnation of Marilyn Monroe, than my detractors have that she is not. And here I rest my case.
Have a very Merry Christmas!
Love and Light,
Adrian
Last edited by pastlifetherapy : Today at 06:16 AM.
#175 Today, 06:32 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 685
Psychics
Dear Adrian,
Your editors gave you very sound advice. However, psychics and astrologers including myself and Kevin Ryerson, despite our disagreements, are confirming some of your conclusions.
Psychics, just like Hypnotherapists are concerned with the mind and its wonderful potential to become awakened and perceive untainted hidden truths.
New Age thought is still somewhat primitive in this area and still lacks clear and accurate insight into some of the deeper mysteries, but it's a fine beginning, despite its rather undisciplined pagan origins.
As for hypnosis is it really more scientifically equipped to obtain accurate past life information than any psychic well versed in healing and meditation?
The human mind is full of impurities where a mixture of fantasy and reality resides.
Last edited by brianstalin : Today at 06:39 AM.
#176 Today, 07:21 AM
pastlifetherapy
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 20
Hypnosis Approval as a Legitimate Scientific Therapeutic Tool by:
British Medical Association: 1955
American Medical Association: 1958
American Psychological Association: 1960
When used by a trained and experienced therapist, hypnosis can temporarily clean impurities or mental/emotional blocks, opening to the subject the clean path to cleave to the Akashic Records and read them accurately. That is why my opinion remains that trance--channelers such as Edgar Cayce, "the sleeping prophet," Kevin Ryerson and others, who enter themselves a self-hypnotic somnambulistic trance, followed by amnesia of what transpired in their reading, seem to have a track record of more accurate readings than others, as in the process, they temporarily dissolve their own aforementioned blocks, thus gaining better access to accurately read the Akashic Records. In this manner, they far surpass the accuracy of a pendulum. Besides, it is something unusual and I would say dubious that most of Brianstalin's readings on people, are of past-lives of Russian personalities. How comes? Why he chose a Russian part name Stalin? Is it a subconscious bias to label so many of his clients as Russian in their past-lives? In addition, I noticed that there are even discrepancies in biometrics as well, the face bone structure for instance between Sherrie and Kezia on one hand and respectively their Russian counterparts in Brian's post above, are very obvious to a trained eye.
Last edited by pastlifetherapy : Today at 07:51 AM.
#177 Today, 07:37 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 685
Therapy
Quote:
Originally Posted by pastlifetherapy
Hypnosis Approval as a Legitimate Scientific Therapeutic Tool by:
British Medical Association: 1955
American Medical Association: 1958
American Psychological Association: 1960
There are many therapeutic tools. Hypnosis may be beneficial and might assist past life recall to a certain extent and even allow us to project our minds into the future.
Isn't meditation a kind of higher or super-refined form of self-hypnosis that can allow our minds to reach far beyond the restraints of the subconscious?
Reiki is similar to hypnosis, except Reiki includes angelic power and the removal of congested energy from the chakra system. We have the New Age to thank for reminding us about the concepts of spirit energy and chakras.
All is for the higher good.
According to ancient systems of thought we cannot achieve pure and untainted psychic insight without a purified mind and chakra system.
Reiki is a gift to the world from an Enlightened Master. Who gave us hypnosis?
Last edited by brianstalin : Today at 07:41 AM.
#178 Today, 08:09 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 685
Superstition Vs. Science
Angels, spirits, chakras, past lives etc. are they not superstitious nonsense at odds with scientific investigation? No, they belong to the realm of the higher sciences known as Metaphysics. Recently scientists have discovered that the Universe is made up of mostly empty space with a few particles jumping in and out of reality. Metaphysics is part of a higher reality that we have created for ourselves.
We are slowly edging towards a new Golden Age of understanding with unlimited possibilities.
Metaphysics as a discipline was a central part of academic inquiry and scholarly education even before the age of Aristotle. Long considered "the Queen of Sciences," its issues were considered no less important than the other main formal subjects of physical science, medicine, mathematics, poetics and music.
#179 Today, 08:27 AM
pastlifetherapy
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 20
Dear Brianstalin,
Hypnosis has been with us for about six thousand years, though not coined "hypnosis," but since the Scottish neurosurgeon James Braid did in 1843. The history of medicine is the history of hypnosis, as medicine was practiced by physicians five-six thousand years ago, in the "sleeping" temples of Egypt and Greece with excellent results. Besides, who says through hypnosis one reaches only the subconscious. FALSE! The subconscious communicates through the heart, not through the brain. And he heart is the hub connecting to super-conscious, thus to the Akashic Records, once is at least temporarily, through an effective hypnotic trance, cleared of impurities, blocks. Meditation and Reiki are great, if the practitioner is guided by the same principle, of at least dissolving temporarily blocks, which prevent the cleaving to the super-conscious.
There are individuals who are very pure, and don't need much cleansing to accomplish the same, but they are extremely rare. The older the soul the easier it is to remember past lives, even without the formal meditation or hypnosis, but again, it happens very seldom. I found out through many years of research and published in my book: "Your Past Lives and the Healing Process, A Psychiatrist Looks at Reincarnation and Spiritual Healing," the ages of the subconscious (1-7.) At age 6-7 the subconscious is practically free of blocks. Consciously, we can instruct the subconscious at this age to connect with the Super-conscious and thus the Akashic Records and retrieve the details of a past-life, without necessarily using hypnosis or meditating.
Don't take me wrong, I understand the beauty and achievements of the New Age. I studied kabbalah, yoga, and all major world religions and philosophies and I'm still learning.
Peace,
Adrian
#180 Today, 08:44 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 685
Scope & Depth
The JFK thread is a self-contained channeled piece of work that follows a Russian theme. I have studied in Russia and this was no accident. I lived at the time of Catherine the Great and personally witnessed some of the past life events I have written about.
Cayce's readings are full of inaccuracies, but despite this Cayce succeeded in passing on important and helpful data. He did not attempt to prove anything, just to heal and give advice.
Does Kevin Ryerson possess pure and untainted psychic insight? What precautions has he undertaken to ensure this? I have described some of my own methods. When passing on information we are obliged to be responsible and to ensure that the data is accurate. Hence the scope and depth of the readings I have given.
Did Cayce possess pure and untainted insight?
"Apparently," he said, "I am one of the few who can lay aside their own personalities sufficiently to allow their souls to make this attunement to a universal source of knowledge -- but I say this without any desire to brag about it. In fact I do not claim to possess anything that other individuals do not inherently possess. Really and truly, I do not believe there is a single individual that does not possess this same ability I have. I am certain that all human beings have much greater powers than they are ever conscious of -- if they would only be willing to pay the price of detachment from self-interest that it takes to develop those abilities."
No personalities spoke through Cayce, his guides politely remained in the background.
With Cayce there were no larger than life characters like the Egyptian Ahtun-Re.
Kevin is working out a past life pattern that includes a spell as John Bunyan. When Bunyan heard voices, he made sure that everyone knew about it. Bunyan's brilliant literary works still delight us to this day.
Sometimes we just move from one lifetime to the next on a predestined course.
Pendulums are wonderful tools. With pendulums we are in direct contact with the higher realms.
#181 Yesterday, 08:58 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 687
Experiences With Hypnosis
Quote:
Originally Posted by pastlifetherapy
Besides, who says through hypnosis one reaches only the subconscious. FALSE! The subconscious communicates through the heart, not through the brain.
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianstalin
Those who regressed me were qualified and all in all, it proved interesting, but unsatisfactory for me. I did see what seemed vivid past life images. I was asked questions as to what year it was, what I was doing, what my name was etc. On all occasions I struggled to answer the questions and felt I was making most of it up. When I learned certain psychic techniques later on in life, I was able to see that what I saw under hypnosis was not all complete fantasy, but a wonderful mosaic of different past lives cobbled together in very creative ways.
My feeling is that screen memories are conveniently dropped into place to obscure our vision of the truth. Sometimes the time is not right to confront harsh truths. I say this based on my own personal experiences of hypnosis.
Without the aid of further psychic experience I would probably have continued to happily believe that I had experienced the Akashic Records directly without any contamination of data or shielding from my devious subconscious.
#182 Yesterday, 01:05 PM
oil painter
Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: I
Posts: 472
The picture or sketch of John Bunyan looks like James Van Praagh, the guy who sees people that have passed over. Are you sure it is Kevin Ryerson?
My pendulum says James not Kevin.
__________________
http://lesliemacon.blogspot.com
Last edited by oil painter : Yesterday at 01:08 PM.
#183 Yesterday, 02:40 PM
janus212
Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 13
Delicious paintings
Delicious paintings, oil painter
http://lesliemacon.blogspot.com/
Recon you were a painter in previous lives as well??
Maybe brianstalin could give you a probe, and see if his findings coincide with your owns.
I'd like to use the opportunity now to send you all wishes of a harmonious and well-bringing Christmas-time.
Love
Jan Egil
Norway.
Alas no snow even here yet.
Too much global warming.
#184 Yesterday, 04:53 PM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 687
Testing
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil painter
The picture or sketch of John Bunyan looks like James Van Praagh, the guy who sees people that have passed over. Are you sure it is Kevin Ryerson? My pendulum says James not Kevin.
No, I don't get James Van Praagh as Bunyan. I certainly tested what you got using my usual methods.
With a pendulum I recommend 20 minutes a day for a 2 year period. I certainly encourage people to test my readings. The data from hypnosis, meditation, channeling or other altered states is all worth looking at. If the data differs, then we should ask why and not look the other way.
I get that James Van Praagh was around in Bunyan's time and had a connection to Mararet Fell, who was popularly known as the "mother of Quakerism". Margaret Fell married George Fox. There was some tension, because Bunyan attacked Quaker beliefs. Perhaps James Van Praagh is the reincarnation of the seated man in the attached picture of an etching by Robert Spence. As for facial similarities, yes, they can occur in soul groups. Ryerson and Van Praagh brothers at one time? - very likely.
Did you get that Van Praagh was Bunyan, because he was Bunyan or because they both belong to the same soul group?
I certainly learned much more from my mistakes, than from my successes
#185 Yesterday, 05:08 PM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 687
Walt Whitman
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianstalin
Margaret Fell married George Fox.
Walt Whitman, who always felt close to the Quakers, later wrote: "George Fox stands for something too—a thought—the thought that wakes in silent hours—perhaps the deepest, most eternal thought latent in the human soul.
This is the thought of God, merged in the thoughts of moral right and the immortality of identity. Great, great is this thought—aye, greater than all else."
I always suspected that Dr Joshua Stone had some past life connection to Walt Whitman.
Only by accessing the Akashic Records accurately, can we know for sure.
He could have been a brother, an uncle or a cousin of Walt Whitman's or perhaps there is no connection at all.
#186 Yesterday, 05:36 PM
oil painter
Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: I
Posts: 472
Early in the morning when I am half awake an angel will talk in my head. I was reading this thread and when I was looking at the picture of John Bunyan the angel said it was James Van Pragh and I pulled out my crystal and pendulumed and it confirmed twice that Bunyan was Van Praagh and negative on Kevin Ryerson. I have no degree from college and I have not one clue what Reiki is so take my opinion with a grain of salt. The thing about the picture comparison of Kevin and Bunyan is the eyes. Kevin has hooded eyes and Bunyan's are flabby. Eyes trigger my remembrance of who someone has been. Primitive methods I employ, huh? I still think you are wrong about Kevin being Bunyan. This whole thread is about you anyway and your accuracy so you wouldn't admit if you were wrong anyway. Tell Janus thanks for the compliments on my art.
__________________
http://lesliemacon.blogspot.com
#187 Yesterday, 07:01 PM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 687
Practical Metaphysics
Well, I think this thread is about open-mindedness and exploration.
Pooling resources and trying to resolve differences in data.
If you were my student, we would first set out to find out who your angel is and whether he/she is well-versed in past lives. In my pendulum classes we sometimes have to shuffle angels and guides around and do some tweaking to ensure the information we get is reliable. For pendulum past life reading my students must be Reiki Level 2. This means extra chakra energy and a relatively clean chakra system to work with.
A class in psychic development will add new tools to your arsenal, and these can be used to double-check the pendulum data. For example, you will have spirit communication, time-travel etc. to choose from.
Does this sound scientific? It's all about metaphysics. To do things well we need training. Naturals like Edgar Cayce don't come along very often and they would still benefit from some guidance and training. After training you would be released into the world as a competent past life reader. You can be just as inaccurate as Cayce and still help many people.
You will have angelic guidance and despite your inevitable errors the angels will ensure the essential and helpful data gets through.
Having said all this it is still possible that you are correct about James Van Praagh being John Bunyan and that I have made a mistake. Where is your pendulum Master to check your findings? Where are your Akashic Record experts?
Where I live, I do have these people to call upon. I have benefited much from their training and patience. To do things well we need teachers. Good ones, preferably.
We must seek them out or pray for them to enter our lives. If we are selfless and have good motives they will promptly appear.
#188 Yesterday, 07:21 PM
bloom
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianstalin
I didn't say her experience was. That's a different thing entirely.
Reincarnation is certainly a theoretical abstraction. Ask a scientist and they will say everything is empty space with a few particles flashing in and out of reality. Not very helpful!
Actually you said this:
Quote:
2. Proving the truth of reincarnation. This is a conceit that even the Enlightened Ones will not engage in. Does the Dalai Lama waste time on theoretical abstractions? No. We all have more important things to do.
#189 Yesterday, 07:28 PM
bloom
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 14
Marilyn Impersonators
Brianstalin,
What about them (according to your point of view)?
Thank you.
#190 Yesterday, 07:33 PM
pastlifetherapy
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 23
Hi OP,
The eyes are thought since antiquity to be the window to the soul. I also rely a great deal in my past-life work on the eyes and their expression.
For instance, Sherrie's eyes' expression is similar to Marilyn's, unlike Szuzsana's whose eyes expression is not similar to M's. I was meditating on why bone structure and its closest structure in the body, the cartilage tissue, or connective tissue (the eyes are made of connective tissue, including the iris,) seems to carry more the resemblance from one lifetime to the next. It occurred to me that the bone remains unchanged in its form for millions of years, according to archeologists. It seems that the genetic spiritual DNA is a constant in the 97% of the DNA, called "junk DNA," which hasn't been discovered and mapped yet, and it is a CONSTANT that is passed from one lifetime to the next. I've been working in the direction of genetic proof with a famous geneticist. As physical is spirit manifest, and both are a continuum, it occurs to me that the constant spiritual DNA is expressed in the bone form, architecture. Besides, the connective tissues, such as the eyes, nose, ears, cresses which make the lines on the palms and fingers (fingerprint), pass the same from one lifetime to the next.
In Sherrie's case, these biomarkers fit, including the eyes and their expression. I was turned down by university experts who because they don't believe in reincarnation, refused to perform and compare the irises scans of Sherrie and Marilyn by the test I devised: PAST/PRESENT LIFE IRIS RECOGNITION COMPARISON TEST (PPL-IRCT,) which I discovered in a twilight state, upon awakening in the morning, and patented it. By the way, Kevin Ryerson through Ahtun-Re confirmed the validity of such a test. In October 5, 2005, the government released for the first time the sensitive information about Iris Recognition to the public. It is more precise than the fingerprint to identify an individual in billions. But to purchase such a camera was not feasible for me, as it had an exorbitant price tag.
Also, to have it done by an expert costs about $30,000. FBI did not release to me the fingerprint of Marilyn to compare it with that of Sherrie's either. In spite of all these adversities, the mounting evidence I accumulated (hundreds and hundreds of signs described in my book,) over a span of eight years, from my research/therapy with Sherrie Lea Laird, confirms to my satisfaction that Sherrie Lea Laird IS the reincarnation of Marilyn Monroe. But to come back to your observation, which is extremely important--the eyes and their expression are a very important biomarker to consider.
Best,
Adrian
pastlifetherapy
#191 Yesterday, 07:44 PM
bloom
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by pastlifetherapy
The eyes are thought since antiquity to be the window to the soul.
Szuszanna edits her photos, she puts the eyes of Marilyn Monroe in the place of her own eyes.
Last edited by bloom : Yesterday at 07:59 PM.
#192 Yesterday, 08:15 PM
pastlifetherapy
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 25
If she does it, eyes editing by Zsuszanna, doesn't seem to help in the total eyes' expression. The disimilarity between her and Mar is quite obvious.
#193 Yesterday, 08:53 PM
oil painter
Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: I
Posts: 473
Hi Adrian,
Thank you for your post. I am nowhere in you or Brian's league but some things I just know on a instinctual level. I am a good observer because of my art. I have always avoided eye contact with people not just for my privacy but to honor theirs too. I have three dogs that have reincarnated back to me in this life each, three times. I know them by their eyes. The last time this happened we walked into Petsmart and the local rescue league had puppies and we walked up and I picked up a malamute/great dane cross puppy and started crying and telling my husband it was my dog, White Fang and he came back to me. Everyone there looked at me like I was from outer space but I knew it was him from his eyes. One and a half years later my husband admits it is him. I am also interested in you saying that you get information in the twilight state because that is when the angel talks to me. Your post helps validate my experience so thank you for that.
PS- As an artist if you paint a portrait and screw up the eyes you can forget about the client liking it. You can screw everything up but you better get the eyes right. I used to do children and animal portraits.
__________________
http://lesliemacon.blogspot.com
#194 Yesterday, 08:58 PM
bloom
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 14
Please, see photo-edits here:
A pink chewing-gum for the one who finds another edited photo.
Last edited by bloom : Today at 01:12 AM.
#195 Yesterday, 11:59 PM
pastlifetherapy
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 25
Dear Bloom,
You're right. It seems the editing in your links of Szuszanna is recent. When I looked at her photos some time ago, it seems the photos were not edited yet. The eyes and their expression were definitely different than those of Mar/Sher.
#196 Today, 12:48 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 693
Satisfaction
Quote:
Originally Posted by pastlifetherapy
Hi OP,
The eyes are thought since antiquity to be the window to the soul. I also rely a great deal in my past-life work on the eyes and their expression.
For instance, Sherrie's eyes' expression is similar to Marilyn's, unlike Szuzsana's whose eyes expression is not similar to M's. I was meditating on why bone structure and its closest structure in the body, the cartilage tissue, or connective tissue (the eyes are made of connective tissue, including the iris,) seems to carry more the resemblance from one lifetime to the next. It occurred to me that the bone remains unchanged in its form for millions of years, according to archeologists. It seems that the genetic spiritual DNA is a constant in the 97% of the DNA, called "junk DNA," which hasn't been discovered and mapped yet, and it is a CONSTANT that is passed from one lifetime to the next. I've been working in the direction of genetic proof with a famous geneticist. As physical is spirit manifest, and both are a continuum, it occurs to me that the constant spiritual DNA is expressed in the bone form, architecture. Besides, the connective tissues, such as the eyes, nose, ears, cresses which make the lines on the palms and fingers (fingerprint), pass the same from one lifetime to the next.
In Sherrie's case, these biomarkers fit, including the eyes and their expression. I was turned down by university experts who because they don't believe in reincarnation, refused to perform and compare the irises scans of Sherrie and Marilyn by the test I devised: PAST/PRESENT LIFE IRIS RECOGNITION COMPARISON TEST (PPL-IRCT,) which I discovered in a twilight state, upon awakening in the morning, and patented it. By the way, Kevin Ryerson through Ahtun-Re confirmed the validity of such a test. In October 5, 2005, the government released for the first time the sensitive information about Iris Recognition to the public. It is more precise than the fingerprint to identify an individual in billions. But to purchase such a camera was not feasible for me, as it had an exorbitant price tag.
Also, to have it done by an expert costs about $30,000. FBI did not release to me the fingerprint of Marilyn to compare it with that of Sherrie's either. In spite of all these adversities, the mounting evidence I accumulated (hundreds and hundreds of signs described in my book,) over a span of eight years, from my research/therapy with Sherrie Lea Laird, confirms to my satisfaction that Sherrie Lea Laird IS the reincarnation of Marilyn Monroe. But to come back to your observation, which is extremely important--the eyes and their expression are a very important biomarker to consider.
Best,
Adrian
But all of this information supports my claim that Sherrie was once the daughter of a previous incarnation of Marilyn Monroe. Why dimsiss the validity of Szuzsana's experience? The Astrologers who told Szuzsana that she is the reincarnation of Marilyn did so for a good reason. Oil Painter believes in the possibility that James Van Praagh was John Bunyan for a good reason. You believe Sherrie was Marilyn for good reasons.
Unfortunately we can't all be right. The Akashic Records are very precise about these things. We shouldn't be so easily satisfied, because easy satisfaction is part of a trend that has led us to be born again and again on this planet.
David Wilcock believes he is the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce. He is quite happy to be very creative in his thinking in order to be satisfied about his beliefs.
"Skeptical reactions of disbelief are understandable. "Oh, they all look a LITTLE alike, but come on!" Reincarnation can be a difficult concept to grasp, particularly when it occurs in "soul groups" like this. The fact of the matter is that some of David's core family members, (not pictured at this time) and some of David's closest and longest friends are very similar to equally central figures in Cayce's lifetime. Cayce's own readings also predicted that this would happen, as we indicated in "The Reincarnation of Edgar Cayce?". The faces are not 100-percent identical, but these discrepancies are apparently caused by the combination of the true face of the Higher Self, and its energetic organizing effect upon the DNA molecule, with the hereditary facial characteristics inherited from either of the parents. Jude has a narrower mouth than Edwin. David's nose and earlobes are differently shaped than Edgar's.
It is also true that Cayce and David looked far LESS alike in their younger years. David was quite overweight between ages 10 and 16, and photos of Cayce from that same time period look scrawny and very different than David does now. It seems that the full energetic effects of the Higher Self upon facial structure are not completely visible until full sexual maturity is reached in the late teens / early 20s.
David's latest scientific research on the energetic effects with the DNA molecule, as he describes in his co-authored book The Reincarnation of Edgar Cayce?, gives a scientific basis for the idea of a "soul" that is apart from the physical body, continues to reincarnate and progressively learn lessons, and has a direct energetic effect upon the structure of the DNA molecule. Russian scientist Dr. Peter Gariaev discovered that DNA absorbs light photons in its surrounding area, and causes the photons to spiral through the molecule itself. This spiraling effect will continue in the same spot for up to 30 days after the DNA is physically removed from that spot -- and this effect is called the "DNA Phantom." Gariaev also shined a gentle laser beam through a developing salamander embryo and redirected it into a developing frog embryo. This caused the frog embryo's DNA to completely re-code itself with the instructions to build a healthy adult salamander ( ! ), even though the two embryos were in hermetically sealed containers and only the light was allowed to pass through.
In the same way, it appears that your "True" form begins affecting how your physical body will look from the moment of conception, as your soul energies begin weaving their way in to the DNA, just like how the salamander's "energy" codes could be transmitted, via laser light, to a frog embryo and cause mutation. As you get older, more and more of this energetic DNA-blending takes place, and your face more closely resembles that of your Higher Self. In the case of Garaiev's research, the salamanders were able to breed with other salamanders, live healthy lives and show no signs of ever having originated from frogs. This also seems to be the primary mechanism responsible for why evolution occurs in sudden, evenly-spaced spurts in our fossil record -- neat cycles of 65 million years and 26 million years have both been discovered and proven to exist".
#197 Today, 01:16 AM
pastlifetherapy
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 25
Brianstalin, come on, eight years span of hard-nose research work I conducted with Sherrie, doesn't mean being "easily satisfied," as opposed to only a few minutes of so-called "Akashic Records reading" you did.
Pastlifetherapy
#198 Today, 01:33 AM
oil painter
Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: I
Posts: 473
Janus 212,
Brianstalin did do "a probe" of me about a year ago. I exchanged a painting for a past life reading, sent him a picture of me and a second picture of me with my husband. He told me the Akashic Records said I was Suzanne Valadon, a french painter ( 1865-1938) in a previous life, and my husband was Pierre Auguste Renoir, also a french painter. So there you go.....
__________________
#199 Today, 01:43 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 693
Not Difficult
Quote:
Originally Posted by pastlifetherapy
Brianstalin, come on, eight years span of hard-nose research work I conducted with Sherrie, doesn't mean being "easily satisfied," as opposed to only a few minutes of so-called "Akashic Records reading" you did.
Eight years is nothing. For many of us a thousand incarnations have proved inadequate for us to fully explore and understand our divinity and to realize that all is illusion. Things seem difficult for us if we don't use all of our brain capacity. Past lives are, in some ways, insignificant illusions and if treated as such can be grasped and sorted out in an instant. Healing and changing our patterns of thought and behavior is the hard and time-consuming part.
#200 Today, 02:00 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 693
Epiphany
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianstalin
Past lives are, in some ways, insignificant illusions and if treated as such can be grasped and sorted out in an instant.
Sudden realization of objective truth is often accompanied by a tingling sensation that shoots from the base of the spine to the crown of the head.
The longer we spend on a problem, the more likely we are struggling in the realm of normal consciousness and the province of guesswork.
Sunday, July 8, 2007
#201 Today, 02:04 AM
Sherrie Lea Laird
Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 33
actually it is I that contacte Suzanna after she wrote saying this woman is not Marilyn I am and here is my site.
I went to the site and low and behold I found she at first looked like her then I thought they were just pics of Mar and others of her then I found Mar's head on her body,
then Chris read the english and hungarian versions of the coincidences. comical at best.
then she put up stuff about us, and recently wrote to us in 2006 that she may or may not regress. Then aside from the video's of reenacting Marilyn who didn't act like that unless she wanted to. The real Mar would come out quite normal, not always acting like a ooey gooey doormat.
infact people find I look and move alot like the Marilyn 'off duty' as well, like when she was golfing or just doing reg stuff...I personally think, suzanna might be Jane Mansfield
because of her body type alone and because Jane was supposed to be the next and improved Marilyn. Quite frankly...like you said Joan of Arc's around the world...well intruth that's impossible, there will be some that know her and one that will have been. For now, until they discover how to use the other unused 97% of what dna does including it's spiritual memories. we're left with lumping the superimposers and the one liners who claim..".I am Marilyn", then do none of the work,with the real re born soul until the cows come home. Lets just say until the REAL MARILYN/NORMA HUMAN BEING REBORN steps forth I am the undisputed who actually worked hard enough and suffered enough, without the benefit of the superimpose pic expert...who's actually
answered stuff previously unknown verified by others. It is Jeanne and Tony who actually have accepted me and a herd of others too who can see I'm the real deal (temporarily until your goddess gets here to help the world out). It is because of my doc and I, others come forward, not because of man made fame, but to thank us for showing a light at the end of the tunnel of their own past live pain...
these people couldn't care less that it's Marilyn that's just the novelty gift wrapping.
Whats more I'd like to make a movie that starts of praising and adoring Marilyn, then they are all stranded on an island and left to fend for food and water, by day 3 or 4 Marilyn would be about as valuable as a cockroach as they all plan to kill each other for survival, then one would kill her and they'd be rescued then suddenly she would be ultimately famous and adored and martyrd again.....such is life, such is the human mind, and it's concepts and it's easily whooped by media influences.
Boring.
I told you, I don't care that suzanna is Marilyn it's just hard to get whole heartedly behind a liar...not a liar in the regular sense, but she is confused and she is lying about the pics and the regressions. so you do the math
Last edited by Sherrie Lea Laird : Today at 02:10 AM.
#202 Today, 02:15 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 694
Astrology
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sherrie Lea Laird
I told you, I don't care that suzanna is Marilyn it's just hard to
get whole heartedly behind a liar...not a liar in the regular sense,
but she is confused and she is lying about the pics and the
regressions. so you do the math
We often accuse others of our own faults. You contacted Suzanna? A symptom of sibling rivalry? Is she lying about the astrologers, too? Or have they led her astray with their inflexible thinking and hard-nosed occult study of the movements of celestial bodies?
#203 Today, 02:16 AM
Sherrie Lea Laird
Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 33
Brian where are you getting your info on Suzanna astrologers, from her, in fact you know so little about her, except her site or do you know more. I mean she does make a living from it, so if you are her friend protecting her, it's fair to tell the rest of the forum. Who are her astrologers what is their track record. I've studied astrology for five years. and it's only in knowing both charts do you see massive similarities and sameness in
behaviours, choices, animals, drug habits. Susanna says she doesn't drink and yet both M and My chart talks openly about our prediliction to that.
read the coincidences in the english section
Nowhere in a chart does it say that if you would dress alike and study someone and birth date not match at all say you are more of someone than any other impersonator
#204 Today, 02:23 AM
pastlifetherapy
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 25
Hi Brianstalin,
You're getting too philosophical, trying to teach me things I knew, anyway. Thank you! You're missing the point. Surely, here in our human existence all is relative, including time. But we should get away from its paralyzing effect, by applying practical spirituality to our earthly existence. Otherwise, no discoveries in our physical manifestation would
be possible, thus no advancement in our human condition. That would equal anarchism. I'm focused in the application of the spiritual into the physical. In this process my main stabilizing factor is my complete faith in God within and everywhere. Without getting into a zillion semantics including the "Akashic Records," God suffices for me as a guide in my mission. But is nice hearing your diatribe. Thank you again! And yes, in view of the above, Sherrie Lea Laird IS the reincarnation of Norma Jean.
Best wishes,
Adrian
#205 Today, 02:29 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 694
mmreincarnation.com
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sherrie Lea Laird
Brian where are you getting your info on Suzanna astrologers, from her, in fact you know so little about her, except her site or do you know more. I mean she does make a living from it, so if you are her friend protecting her, it's fair to tell the rest of the forum. Who are her astrologers what is their track record. I've studied astrology for five years. and it's only in knowing both charts do you see massive similarities and sameness in
behaviours, choices, animals, drug habits. Susanna says she doesn't drink and yet both M and My chart talks openly about our prediliction to that.
read the coincidences in the english section
Nowhere in a chart does it say that if you would dress alike and study someone and birth date not match at all say you are more of someone than any other impersonator
BIOGRAPHY
1999: This was the first time when Zsuzsa applied for a job at an agency, in which a photographer told her that he would like to work with her as she was just like Norma Jeane. This year she was introduced by a newspaper as the reincarnation of Marilyn Monroe. As a result of this article a ’seer’ confirmed that Zsuzsa had been born with Marilyn Monroe’s soul.
2000: In a TV programme a parallel was drawn between the personality and lifeline of Zsuzsa and that of Marilyn. In this programme a prophetess said that she could feel the same from Zsuzsa’s glance as from Marilyn’s.
2001: Zsuzsa - three months pregnant that time - was introduced again as the reincarnation of Norma Jeane in a newspaper.
2002: A magazine wrote about Zsuzsa’s lifeline and marriage. A local newspaper introduced her as a poet.
2003: In a programme an astrologer definitely said that Zsuzsa is the reincarnation of Marilyn Monroe. After that Zsuzsa had a role in a film about a trial in which her figure was the woman who seduced men.
2004: In a show she sang a song of Marilyn Monroe and posed in a white dress above a vent-hole for the first time. Later there was an article about her in a daily newspaper entitled “Marilyn is still alive”. Another article in a women’s magazine analysed the similarities between Zsuzsa and Marilyn. After that in an interview an astrologer, seeing the great deal of sameness, said, “Things do not happen by chance.” Later Zsuzsa was
asked to sing in a show. The showman, who always criticised people, remarked, “Even her running is like that of Marilyn.” No wonder that at the end of that year she was invited to a celebrity’s birthday. As a magazine wrote, “She is the reincarnation of Marilyn Monroe whispering ‘Happy Birthday’”.
2005. May.: Hypnosis! Zsuzsanna is really reincarnated of Marilyn Monroe!!! (?)
2005: The T-Online telephone company asked Zsuzsa to enact Marilyn Monroe in its advertisement. They said they did not want a double, rather Monroe herself, as they wanted to have an impression as if Marilyn Monroe’s act had been cut from a film.
This is the English translation of Zsuzsanna's biography from her website.
http://mmreincarnation.com/elet_rajz.html
I think some of these things can be checked. Why would she lie? Yes, I think there are reasons for the similarities between you and Marilyn Monroe I think there are reasons why people see similarities between Zsuzsanna and Marilyn, too. All very interesting!
#206 Today, 02:31 AM
Sherrie Lea Laird
Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 33
no Sibling rivalry it's what she said in her letter to my doctor, which he shared with me as she is not his patient, my letters were loving and caring by the way.
and said that she could be marilyn or someone who knew mar, and that it was all good, but then hers kept coming with more and more comments about me!
you are so suspicious in your nature that's why it hard to hear some of the genius things you are saying, why? because your decisions towards my previous live on bias alone has become a blockade.
THE FACTS are this alone. IN A COURT OF LAW...she superimposes the pics and has lied about other things in letters to us. She is going from gig to gig that is her job...and all you can tell my wonderful Doctor is that he is in this for money and that her points are valid. I always said, told to me by my cop dad and genius mom. consider the source..and both yourself and susanna are the ones who have much more vested in it.yours, to be right.hers, to be adored~ We on the other hand have donated my case and suffering along with my CONFIRMED GLADYS and our privacy to mankind. I was adored by others before, and no thanks actually, it's kind of a creepy feeling. And definitely it's even strange if you sit in a room or at a party and someone thinks your name is Sheryl or Sharon, finally at some point you'll correct them, me mostly I say it right away to save all of our uncomfort. so can you imagine pretending to be someone
else when you're this spiritually advanced...MINE COMPARED TO SUSANNA's I mean....Boastful??? or truthful
Last edited by Sherrie Lea Laird : Today at 02:54 AM.
#207 Today, 02:35 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 694
Positive Conclusions
Quote:
Originally Posted by pastlifetherapy
Hi Brianstalin,
You're getting too philosophical, trying to teach me things I knew, anyway. Thank you! You're missing the point. Surely, here in our human existence all is relative, including time. But we should get away from its paralyzing effect, by applying practical spirituality to our earthly existence. Otherwise, no discoveries in our physical manifestation would be possible, thus no advancement in our human condition. That would equal anarchism. I'm focused in the application of the spiritual into the physical. In this process my main stabilizing factor is my complete faith in God within and everywhere. Without getting into a zillion semantics including the "Akashic Records," God suffices for me as a guide in my mission. But is nice hearing your diatribe. Thank you again! And yes, in view of the above, Sherrie Lea Laird IS the reincarnation of Norma Jean.
Best wishes,
Adrian
Sherrie Lea Laird IS the reincarnation of Norma Jean.? Insufficient data to reach any positive conclusion.
Thanks Adrian!
Merry Xmas!
#208 Today, 02:42 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 694
Akashic Records
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sherrie Lea Laird
no Sibling rivalry it's what she said in her letter to my doctor, which he shared with me as she is not his patient, my letters were loving and caring by the way.
and said that she could be marilyn or someone who knew mar, and that it was all good, but then hers kept coming with more and more comments about me!
you are so suspicious in your nature that's why it hard to hear some of the genius things you are saying, why? because your decisions towards my previous live on bias alone has become a blockade.
THE FACTS are this alone. IN A COURT OF LAW...she superimposes the pics and has lied about other things in letters to us. She is going from gig to gig that is her job...and all you can tell my wonderful Doctor is that he is in this for money and that her points are valid. I always said, told to me by my cop dad and genius mom. consider the source..and both yourself and susanna are the ones who have much more vested in it.yours, to be right.hers, to be adored~ We on the other hand have donated my case and suffering along with my CONFIRMED GLADYS and our privacy to mankind. I was adored by others before, and no thanks actually, it's kind of a creepy feeling. And definitely it's even strange if you sit in a room or at a party and someone thinks your name is Sheryl or Sharon, finally at some point you'll correct them, me mostly I say it right away to save all of our uncomfort. so can you imagine pretending to be someone
else when you're this spiritually advanced...MINE COMPARED TO SUSANNA's I mean....Boastful??? or truthful
Dear Sherrie,
Well the Akashic Records confirm that Zsuzsanna has past life connections with Marilyn. The Akashic Records do not lie. Don't take my word for it, but explore these things for yourself.
Merry Xmas!
#209 Today, 02:44 AM
Sherrie Lea Laird
Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 33
Brian, her site wasn't around until the book was announced.
She opened up sometime last year, updated in Sept.
She's sent us stuff long before you were aware of it, I've watched her download new things and change some of the really bad superimposed pictures, even the people at mmforum make ridiculous jokes of her. The only person they treated worse than me.
If I took a picture of my dog and superimposed it on our cat should I then write to the enquirer that we gave birth to dat's or cogs.
Do you understand that these are all new articles, all hearsay, and when I first used to see her site, she had only.ONLY her look alike pose alike skirt blowing pics. and vids.
lately she's gathered some real, paid for or fake press and so what.
It still stands to gather that, in a court of law, forsenics wise.
She is lying and the point is. FOR WHAT.. for you, for mankind, for her neighbour. never once until copying us, and I don't even know where she mentions healing. Ok so she's Marilyn whoopty doo. it's the way you are making yourself look that seems really bizarre that you are so adamant to go to bat for someone who doesn't even get to be near her confirmed by you GLadys. and a liar at that. You are so adamant, why, cause the truth hurts and scares us, more than any other thing. It's easier and safer to believe
her body with Marilyn's head, then you can deal with the whole novelty and entertainment side of it. Not too serious etc.
Why. Why are you doing this at all.
I can't believe I'm in a discussion over the Globe type....Woman gives birth
to two headed alien baby. Your Susanna is not Marilyn...sad but true.
ok...I''m not? then she's not. Fair enough...cause you just look silly, don't do it, it's not worth it, cause there's nothing in return for you or anyone you love. Unless of course you do know her, which seems to make more sense.
Last edited by Sherrie Lea Laird : Today at 02:49 AM.
#210 Today, 02:46 AM
bloom
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by pastlifetherapy
Dear Bloom,
You're right. It seems the editing in your links of Szuszanna is recent.When I looked at her photos some time ago, it seems the photos were not edited yet. The eyes and their expression were definitely dfferent than those of Mar/Sher.
Dear Pastlifetherapy,
Difficult to find a picture of Zsuzsanna untouched by the photo editor, but indeed, I agree, her eyes are definitely different. No Marilyn there.
Last edited by bloom : Today at 02:55 AM.
#211 Today, 02:55 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 699
Understanding
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sherrie Lea Laird
Brian, her site wasn't around until the book was announced.
She opened up sometime last year, updated in Sept.
She's sent us stuff long before you were aware of it, I've watched her download new things and change some of the really bad superimposed pictures, even the people at mmforum make ridiculous jokes of her. The only person they treated worse than me.
If I took a picture of my dog and superimposed it on our cat should I then write to the enquirer that we gave birth to dat's or cogs.
Do you understand that these are all new articles, all hearsay, and when I first used to see her site, she had only.ONLY her look alike pose alike skirt blowing pics. and vids.
lately she's gathered some real, paid for or fake press and so what.
It still stands to gather that, in a court of law, forsenics wise.
She is lying and the point is. FOR WHAT.. for you, for mankind, for her neighbour. never once until copying us, and I don't even know where she mentions healing. Ok so she's Marilyn whoopty doo. it's the way you are making yourself look that seems really bizarre that you are so adamant to go to bat for someone who doesn't even get to be near her confirmed by you GLadys. and a liar at that. You are so adamant, why, cause the truth hurts and scares us, more than any other thing. It's easier and safer to believe
her body with Marilyn's head, then you can deal with the whole novelty and entertainment side of it. Not too serious etc.
Why. Why are you doing this at all.
I can't believe I'm in a discussion over the Globe type....Woman gives birth
to two headed alien baby. Your Susanna is not Marilyn...sad but true.
ok...I''m not? then she's not. Fair enough...cause you just look silly, don't do it, it's not worth it, cause there's nothing in return for you or anyone you love. Unless of course you do know her, which seems to make more sense.
I understand what you are saying. These things are sent to try us. A sister from a past life is pulling out all the stops to try to teach you a lesson. Is it painful? Does it cause you anguish? It's all about using these annoying things in positive ways to learn more about ourselves and our relationships with others.
#212 Today, 03:02 AM
bloom
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianstalin
BIOGRAPHY
1999: This was the first time when Zsuzsa applied for a job at an agency, in which a photographer told her that he would like to work with her as she was just like Norma Jeane. This year she was introduced by a newspaper as the reincarnation of Marilyn Monroe. As a result of this article a ’seer’ confirmed that Zsuzsa had been born with Marilyn Monroe’s soul.
Name Please?
2000: In a TV programme a parallel was drawn between the personality and lifeline of Zsuzsa and that of Marilyn. In this programme a prophetess said that she could feel the same from Zsuzsa’s glance as from Marilyn’s.
Name please?
2001: Zsuzsa - three months pregnant that time - was introduced again as the reincarnation of Norma Jeane in a newspaper.
2002: A magazine wrote about Zsuzsa’s lifeline and marriage. A local newspaper introduced her as a poet.
2003: In a programme an astrologer definitely said that Zsuzsa is the reincarnation of Marilyn Monroe. After that Zsuzsa had a role in a film about a trial in which her figure was the woman who seduced men.
Name please?
2004: In a show she sang a song of Marilyn Monroe and posed in a white dress above a vent-hole for the first time. Later there was an article about her in a daily newspaper entitled “Marilyn is still alive”. Another article in a women’s magazine analysed the
similarities between Zsuzsa and Marilyn. After that in an interview an astrologer, seeing the great deal of sameness, said, “Things do not happen by chance.” Later Zsuzsa was asked to sing in a show. The showman, who always criticised people, remarked, “Even her running is like that of Marilyn.” No wonder that at the end of that year she was invited to a celebrity’s birthday. As a magazine wrote, “She is the reincarnation of Marilyn Monroe whispering ‘Happy Birthday’”.
Name please?
2005. May.: Hypnosis! Zsuzsanna is really reincarnated of Marilyn Monroe!!! (?)
2005: The T-Online telephone company asked Zsuzsa to enact Marilyn Monroe in its advertisement. They said they did not want a double, rather Monroe herself, as they wanted to have an impression as if Marilyn Monroe’s act had been cut from a film.
This is the English translation of Zsuzsanna's biography from her website.
http://mmreincarnation.com/elet_rajz.html
I think some of these things can be checked. Why would she lie? Yes, I think there are reasons for the similarities between you and Marilyn Monroe I think there are reasons why people see similarities between Zsuzsanna and Marilyn, too. All very interesting!
Thank you.
#213 Today, 03:07 AM
osiris
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: D
Posts: 4,556
Hi Sherrie
Just saying Hi, I let the rest of them do all the arguing. I got better things to think about!
__________________
Love, Michael, The Valkyrie
#214 Today, 03:09 AM
bloom
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianstalin
I understand what you are saying. These things are sent to try us. A sister from a past life is pulling out all the stops to try to teach you a lesson. Is it painful? Does it cause you anguish? It's all about using these annoying things in positive ways to learn more about ourselves and our relationships with others.
Have you considered that the percentage of error when reading the Akashic Records, is from 1% to 100%? And under these circumstances you judge Sherrie Lea Laird and give her sermon!
You're not enlightened!
#215 Today, 03:17 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 699
Error
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloom
Have you considered that the percentage of error when reading the Akashic Records, is from 1% to 100%? And under these circumstances you judge Sherrie Lea Laird and give her sermon!
You're not enlightened!
I would put my accuracy at about 90%. Otherwise I wouldn't dare to say anything on the subject. I have double-checked thousands of my readings.
The feedback was useful for identifying error and increasing accuracy. I don't expect belief. I welcome challenges and alternative readings to my own.
After a while, we get to understand that there is merit in all psychic data, even data from hypnosis. As for being not enlightened, we are all in the same boat.
#216 Today, 03:23 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 699
Teachers
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianstalin
I have double-checked thousands of my readings.
Dear Bloom,
If you, Sherrie and Adrian visit me in Thailand, I will introduce you to my teachers and you can draw your own conclusions. They will certainly be able to teach you a lot.
Last edited by brianstalin : Today at 03:27 AM.
#217 Today, 03:33 AM
bloom
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 18
Quote:
After a while, we get to understand that there is merit in all psychic data, even data from hypnosis. As for being not enlightened, we are all in the same boat.
No. You are in your boat. I am in my boat.
#218 Today, 03:39 AM
pastlifetherapy
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianstalin
Sherrie Lea Laird IS the reincarnation of Norma Jean.? Insufficient data to reach any positive conclusion.
Thanks Adrian!
Merry Xmas!
Did you read my all account in my book: "Marilyn Monroe Returns: The Healing of a Soul," in order to emphatically affirm: "insufficient data to reach any positive conclusion?" To the best of my judgment, you didn't. Therefore, this alone speaks by itself how unscientifically, negligently and irrresponsibly you treat human feelings, other fellow humans. I agree with Bloom there is no enlightment here. At least, Sherrie, Bloom, I and others in this forum are striving for such, by being patient and listening
as long as we did to your non-sense.
Have a Merry Christmas too, and let's look together for the real enlightment, Godly,
Adrian
#219 Today, 03:43 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 699
Sharing Responsibility
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloom
No. You are in your boat. I am in my boat.
We are all co-creators of this "reality". If this weren't so, we wouldn't be here at the same time and communicating with each other.
Later there was an article about her in a daily newspaper entitled “Marilyn is still alive”. Another article in a women’s magazine analysed the similarities between Zsuzsa and Marilyn. After that in an interview an astrologer, seeing the great deal of sameness, said, “Things do not happen by chance.”
http://mmreincarnation.com/elet_rajz.html
"Things do not happen by chance". These are the words of a wise person.
#220 Today, 03:48 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 699
Higher Truths
Quote:
Originally Posted by pastlifetherapy
Did you read my all account in my book: "Marilyn Monroe Returns: The Healing of a Soul," in order to emphatically affirm: "insufficient data to reach any positive conclusion?" To the best of my judgment, you didn't. Therefore, this alone speaks by itself how unscientifically, negligently and irrresponsibly you treat human feelings, other fellow humans. I agree with Bloom there is no enlightment here. At least, Sherrie, Bloom, I and others in this forum are striving for such, by being patient and listening
as long as we did to your non-sense.
Have a Merry Christmas too, and let's look together for the real enlightment, Godly,
Adrian
My guides assure me that reincarnation will never be proved, at least no time soon. After
reading your book will I be convinced that reincarnation is a fact?
#221 Today, 03:59 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 705
Illusion
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianstalin
My guides assure me that reincarnation will never be proved, at least no time soon. After reading your book will I be convinced that reincarnation is a fact?
Past lives are shadows and illusion. The ego, however, is a dominant thing in our illusionary Universe.
Only an egoist will seek to prove the reality of an illusion.
The great Edgar Cayce did not make startling claims.
#222 Today, 04:01 AM
bloom
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 21
Brianstalin
You certainly use language in a style common among people who work as psychics. Of that I am sure.
Oh, by the way, make sure your guides aren't your longing for enlightement.
Last edited by bloom : Today at 04:07 AM.
#223 Today, 04:04 AM
pastlifetherapy
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 28
Brianstalin, the answer is: No, you will not be convinced about reincarnation by reading my book, if you are blocked by your preconcieved ideas about the all matter. But if you open-mindedly read my book, there is a chance that you will change your negative position on the matter of reincarnation, and specifically on MM's reincarnation in the person of SLL.
Last edited by pastlifetherapy : Today at 04:14 AM.
#224 Today, 04:09 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 705
Sharing Information
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianstalin
Past lives are shadows and illusion. The ego, however, is a dominant thing in our illusionary Universe.
Only an egoist will seek to prove the reality of an illusion.
The great Edgar Cayce did not make startling claims.
Edgar Cayce who used the Akashic records said that his trance statements should be taken into account only to the extent that they led to a better life for the recipient: "Does it make one a better husband, a better businessman, a better neighbor, a better artist, a better churchman? If so, cleave to it; if not, reject it. Moreover, he invited his audience to test his suggestions rather than accept them on faith.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgar_Cayce
This can be extended to any statements or suggestions about intangible things.
#225 Today, 04:16 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 705
Open-Minded
Quote:
Originally Posted by pastlifetherapy
The answer is : No, if you are blocked by your preconcieved ideas about the all matter. But if you open-mindedly read my book, there is a chance that you will change your negative position on the matter of reincarnation, and specifically on MM's reincarnation in the person of SLL.
Will you likewise test my readings? Will you consider the possibility of a pastlife connection between Sherrie and Zsuzsanna? Will you admit the possibility of error?
I'm neutral about reincarnation. It has practical benefits for healing and so I work with it.
#226 Today, 04:30 AM
bloom
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 21
Brianstalin's words:
Quote:
Will you likewise test my readings? Will you consider the possibility of a pastlife connection between Sherrie and Zsuzsanna?
Will you admit the possibility of error?
I'm neutral about reincarnation. It has practical benefits for healing and so I work with it.
Quote:
Past lives are shadows and illusion. The ego, however, is a dominant
thing in our illusionary Universe.
Only an egoist will seek to prove the reality of an illusion.
Quote:
My guides assure me that reincarnation will never be proved, at
least no time soon.
P.S. I have a message for your guides. Would you kindly tell them they will reincarnate? You see, they have a few things to work out.
Last edited by bloom : Today at 04:55 AM.
#227 Today, 04:39 AM
pastlifetherapy
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianstalin
Will you likewise test my readings? Will you consider the possibility of a pastlife connection between Sherrie and Zsuzsanna? Will you admit the possibility of error?
I'm neutral about reincarnation. It has practical benefits for healing and so I work with it.
You posted before that you are 90% right in your readings. Let's assume you scientifically, rigorously built such a statistic and is not based on your self-proclaiming feeling alone. Then I can affirm the same as a working hypothesis, about my findings and consider the posibility of a connection between Zsuzsanna and Sherrie; but possibility is not probability. Edgar Cayce, you quoted before, implied that if you don't
have anything good to say, that would advance an individual (such as Sherrie,) don't say anything. That certainly reflected the measure of his enlightenment. I totally agree with him. My Hypocratic oath is also: "Physician, do not hurt!" The enlightened Kahunas of Hawaii had the same, only one commendment, not ten: "Do not hurt!" In this case, Brianstalin, do not hurt Sherrie, as you are not 100% accurate in your readings. And
even then, if I were you, I wouldn't do it. Please, reflect on "why!"
#228 Today, 04:44 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 705
Guides
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloom
P.S. I have a message for your guides. Would you kindly tell them
they will reincarnate? You see, they have a few things to work out.
Yes, indeed they will. They have wreaked havoc in their previous past lives and they are keen to get across the idea of personal responsibility. A responsibility for the past lives we conveniently choose to forget or choose to misinterpret and glamorize.
#229 Today, 04:53 AM
bloom
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianstalin
Yes, indeed they will. They have wreaked havoc in their previous past lives and they are keen to get across the idea of personal responsibility. A responsibility for the past lives we conveniently choose to forget or choose to misinterpret and glamorize.
So, there you have it. Your guides can't tell you accurately if reincarnation will be proved or not.
#230 Today, 04:57 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 705
Truth
Quote:
Originally Posted by pastlifetherapy
You posted before that you are 90% right in your readings. Let's assume you scientifically, rigorously built such a statistic and is not based on your self-proclaiming feeling alone. Then I can affirm the same as a working hypothesis, about my findings and consider the posibility of a connection between Zsuzsanna and Sherrie; but possibility is not probability. Edgar Cayce, you quoted before, implied that if you don't
have anything good to say, that would advance an individual (such as Sherrie,) don't say anything. That certainly reflected the measure of his enlightenment. I totally agree with him. My Hypocratic oath is also: "Physician, do not hurt!" The enlightened Kahunas of Hawaii had the same, only one commendment, not ten: "Do not hurt!" In this case, Brianstalin, do not hurt Sherrie, as you are not 100% accurate in your readings. And even then, if I were you, I wouldn't do it. Please, reflect on "why!"
I just pass on information that might be useful. Feel free to reject it.
Yes, I have always stated I can be in error. Will you test my readings out of curiosity? Why did Sherrie contact Zsuzsanna? Are you able to explain that? Can Sherrie explain it? There is always someone with a greater perspective than our own. I post my pastlife readings here in the hope that someone can come along and correct them, if they are wrong. I'm limited to 2 Akashic Record readers to double-check with at my end. If
people are clueless about past lives how can we get healed before 2012? To withhold truth is to hurt. Have I given you truth? That's for Sherrie to decide.
#231 Today, 05:00 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 708
Proof
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloom
So, there you have it. Your guides can't tell you accurately if reincarnation will be proved or not.
Can we prove anything with certainty? We can heal and get healed so that we have a better chance of understanding what reality consists of or doesn't consist of.
#232 Today, 05:04 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 708
Healing
Healing is balance and alignment. With the aid of higher energies, it is empowerment.
#233 Today, 05:17 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 708
Distress
Quote:
Originally Posted by pastlifetherapy
"Physician, do not hurt!" The enlightened Kahunas of Hawaii had the same, only one commendment, not ten: "Do not hurt!" In this case, Brianstalin, do not hurt Sherrie, as you are not 100% accurate in your readings. And even then, if I were you, I wouldn't do it. Please, reflect on "why!"
Are you aware of the potential harm that you may do to Sherrie in convincing her that she is the reincarnation of Marilyn Monroe? Will you allow her no alternative? Some freedom to breathe? Someone posted that Sherrie never wanted to be Marilyn. She already seems to feel uncomfortable about her competition with Zsuzsanna. Is this not
distressful?
When I give my readings, I always say to not take them on faith, no matter how compelling the evidence. We must constantly test our reality or we get trapped in illusion and must constantly defend our positions. War is just one minor consequence of such rigidity of thinking.
br
#234 Today, 05:26 AM
bloom
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 25
It fits in this thread
Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson went on a camping trip. As they lay down for the night, Holmes said: -Watson, look up into the sky and tell me what you see.
Watson: -I see millions and millions of stars.
Holmes: -And what does that tell you?
Watson: -Astronomically, it tells me that there are millions of galaxies and potentially billions of planets. Theologically, it tells me that God is great. Meteorologically, it tells me that we will have a beautiful day tomorrow. What does it tell you?
Holmes: -Somebody stole our tent.
Yep, that pretty much sums it up!!!!!!
#236 Today, 05:38 AM
bloom
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianstalin
Yep, that pretty much sums it up!!!!!!
Please, don't put part of my post out of context.
#237 Today, 05:40 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 708
Conclusion
That, as you well know, was the conclusion.
#238 Today, 05:41 AM
pastlifetherapy
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianstalin
I just pass on information that might be useful. Feel free to reject it. Yes, I have always stated I can be in error. Will you test my readings out of curiosity? Why did Sherrie contact Zsuzsanna? Are you able to explain that? Can Sherrie explain it? There is always someone with a greater perspective than our own. I post my past life readings here in the hope that someone can come along and correct them, if they are wrong. I'm limited to 2 Akashic Record readers to double-check with at my end. If people are clueless about past lives how can we get healed before 2012? To withhold truth is to hurt. Have I given you truth? That's for Sherrie to decide.
You explain away basic truths to buttress you argument of seeking the "truth." The TRUTH doesn't hurt anyone, only the negativity, the travesty of truth does, the explaining away, rationalizing the truth, does it. Year 2012, in my view is negativity sent to the universe. Luckily, there will not be the critical mass of believers in the world's population, by that time, for the universe to send back to us this concocted calamity by
misguided spirit guides, including yours, as you acknowledged to Bloom.
In the history of mankind there were always false prophets, false spirit guides, who propagated fear. They failed miserably. God is our Rock! God is the first positive word in the dictionary, from which all positive words spring, beginning with love, second to It in its highest vibration.
And people are not clueless about past lives. Sherrie/Marilyn is a high profile example of their healing power message that she and I sent to the world, traveling around the globe, as we speak, through a huge number of national and international major media, TV, radio, press, giving a POSITIVE message to our troubled world, of not only healing our bodies, but healing our collective spirit, which brings to real love of each other and peace, unlike others seeking self-aggrandizement and self-interest, making a living out of it.
A great Master who believed in divine love said: "Cheer up, we have overcome the world!"
#239 Today, 05:42 AM
bloom
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 25
Quote:
Someone posted that Sherrie never wanted to be Marilyn.
This too was taken out of context.
#240 Today, 05:44 AM
bloom
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianstalin
That, as you well know, was the conclusion.
It was a conclusion in its context.
#241 Today, 06:49 AM
bloom
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 28
Merry Christmas!
~ bloom ~
#242 Today, 06:57 AM
pastlifetherapy
Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 31
MERRY CHRISTMAS TO YOU BLOOM!
Adrian
#243 Today, 07:03 AM
bloom
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 28
Thank you.
#244 Today, 07:06 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 716
Zsuzsanna Untouched
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloom
Dear Pastlifetherapy,
Difficult to find a picture of Zsuzsanna untouched by the photo editor, but indeed, I agree, her eyes are definitely different. No Marilyn there.
Comparing Zsuzsanna with Marilyn before her plastic surgeries. They aren't too dissimilar.
Yes, it has been discusssed a lot how many and what plastic surgeries she had - were her breasts real, and her eyes that big, and the jawlines, but one thing we can say for sure: Marilyn Monroe did have rhinoplasty. She undergone plastic surgery in 1946, when she signed a contract with Twentieth Century-Fox Studios and an agent suggested Norma should become Marylin to boost her career. After that Norma Jean Baker changed her name, dyed her hair and underwent rhinoplasty to make her bulbous nose more feminine.
http://www.celebrityplasticpics.com...tic_surgery.htm
http://mmreincarnation.com/media.html
She is also supposed to have had her chin altered.
#245 Today, 07:19 AM
bloom
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 28
They are too dissimilar in the way they apply lipstick.
|
|
